#Diskmark results software#

The result depends on Test File Size, Test File Position, Fragmentation.

CrystalDiskInfo can give us some basic information about the SSD, and confirms we are operating at PCIe 3.0 x4 speeds using NVMe 1.3.

That would differentiate them from the QLC-based Crucial P2 1TB model. However, I've never seen anything similar for UNIX - at most what you get is a dd for sequential read/write tests, which gives no indication on the IOPS parameters of the hardware in question. About CrystalDiskMark CrystalDiskMark is a simple disk benchmark software. In addition, the Crucial P2 250GB and 500GB drives have been confirmed to use TLC NAND, at least in the past.

Again looking at some baselines I seem to get reasonable result in 3D-Complex (52) but very poor results in 3D-Medium (3) and 3D-Simple (5).If you're shopping for an SSD, you've surely seen one of those screenshots from CrystalDiskMark with a few green squares, and the 2x4 matrix with results of doing read/write tests for the given hardware: I don't see anything out of the ordinary tbh. If this server is bare-metal, you may still get more or less an idea of its storage performance, though. DiskSPD is a more accurate tool for this. Not very important to me but interesting are my 3D Mark results. Crystal disk mark can't really be the right tool to test the underlying RAID performance. If I do have a problem where do I start looking for a solution? This is useful for when you take screenshots like these. When it finishes, click on the text entry box at the bottom of CrystalDiskMark, and you can type in some descriptive info about your storage, then hit enter. (If the default is 5, you can change it to 3, which should be enough to get more accurate results. However the Disk Mark (34) looks very very low (for comparison a baseline with same CPU/HDD achieves 423).Ĭomparing against some baselines (similar CPU and Memory) the Random Seek + RW performance is reasonable (but on the low side), however the Sequential results are down by a factor of at least 10. Version 8.0.4a for Windows, Multilingual. Click the All button, and all of the tests will run. To measure your drive's read and write performance using CrystalDiskMark, close all running programs and use the following steps: Step 1: Launch CrystalDiskMark to access its interface. Using v6.1 of Performance Test my CPU Mark (1584) and my Memory Mark (675) look reasonable (for this specification).

The following diagram shows the CrystalDiskMark results once again compared. The Gigabyte Aorus drive took the top spot and its support for PCIe 4.0 put it at an advantage. Let us continue with the benchmark results. It measures sequential read and write performance and random read and write speeds of random 4KB and 4KB (queue depth 32) data. CrystalDiskMark consumes minimum system resources and does not.

#Diskmark results software#

I have just completed my first PC build and have some concerns about my disk performance. CrystalDiskMark is an easy-to-run and quick utility to use to gauge a drive’s performance. The software displays the test results in the main software window in a user-friendly form.